The Reformed Jewish Calendar

BibArch Home
Up
Search Site
Contents
Books'n Mor
Overview
Concepts & Theory
Levantine Fieldwork
The First Christians
Perspectives
Critical Perspectives
Feature Articles
Biblical Chronology
The Levant
Music &The Bible
Helps & Aids
Travel & Touring
Words & Phrases
Photo Gallery
Useful Links
Who We Are
Our History & Purpose
Works Cited
What We Believe
Article Submissions
How to Cite BibArch
How to Contact Us

Copyright � 1997-2004
High Top Media

All Rights Reserved.

Legal Notices

BibArch Home ] Up ] Reformed Jewish Calendar CE 1-39 ]

Calendar Rules

The civil Hebrew New Year begins on the first of Tishri, which occurs in the fall during September or October. The molad, an astronomical phenomenon, is the Hebrew word for the conjunction of the earth, moon, and sun. The first of Tishri does not always occur on the day of the molad of Tishri because of dehioth (postponements). When the molad of Tishri occurs at a time unaffected by the postponement rules Tishri 1 is on the same day as the molad. The four postponement rules are:

  1. The occurrence of the molad of Tishri at 12 noon (18 hours 0 parts) or later postpones Tishri 1 to the next day because the crescent of the moon must occur on Tishri 1 under the postponement rules. Although a Hebrew day began at sunset, for the purpose of computing the conjunctions of the sun and moon, the days commenced at the preceding noon. This means that the official day for calculating a molad goes from noon to noon and not from sunset to sunset. Of course, causing the day to fall on a Monday, Wednesday, or Friday, due to a postponement delays it for an additional day. A delay of a molad can not be for longer than two days nor advanced forward.

  2. The first of Tishri may never occur on a Sunday, Wednesday, or Friday. This rule prevents the occurrence of two consecutive (back-to-back) sabbaths during the fall religious festival season. If the molad of Tishri, or a postponement, falls on a Sunday, Wednesday, or Friday, then Tishri 1 falls one day later, to a Monday, Thursday, or Sabbath, respectively. Such delays are known as political postponements. Two successive sabbath days would create some inconvenience in the general life of the community. Recall that sabbaths include both weekly and annual sabbaths (the high sabbaths or seven annual holy days).

  3. Since the seventh-day sabbath is a Saturday a postponement is necessary when the molad of Tishri falls on a Sunday or a Friday in order to avoid two consecutive sabbaths (a weekly sabbath and a fall holy day) back-to-back). This avoids causing the preparation days for the Feast of Trumpets, the feast of Tabernacles, and the Last Great Day from being weekly sabbaths and the preparation day for the weekly sabbath being the Feast of Trumpets or the Last Great Day. A Friday postponement also prevents the Day of Atonement from falling on a Sunday avoiding two consecutive sabbaths.

  4. The first of Tishri may not occur on a Wednesday to block the Day of Atonement (Tishri 10), a high sabbath, from falling on a Friday. A Friday Day of Atonement would cause particular hardship for the community since food preparation could not occur on a weekly sabbath day even though it followed a required fast day.

The occurrence of the molad of Tishri of a common year falling 3 hours 204 parts or later (after 3:12 a.m.) on a Tuesday, requires the delay of the first of Tishri until Wednesday, and by the first rule further postponed to Thursday. This delay prevents the year commencing with that molad of Tishri from having more than 355 days, which is not allowed, and still permit the common year that ends with this molad of Tishri to have 354 days. A delay until Thursday instead of Wednesday arises because Wednesday may never be the first of Tishri under the first rule cited above.

A molad of Tishri occurring on or after 9 hours 589 parts or later (that is, 9:33 a.m. or later) on a Monday in a common year immediately following an intercalary year requires delay of the first of Tishri until Tuesday. This delay results from the embolistic year before having started with a Thursday. The common year, the year that begins with the molad of Tishri in question, must start on a Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday. Tuesday is the only permissible day because the first rule cited above one eliminates Wednesday and since no postponement may be greater than two days eliminates Thursday.

Under the rules of the Reformed Jewish calendar, Passover regulates all the other festival times in the Hebrew calendar. Passover Sabbath, Nisan 15, begins at twilight at the end of the 14th day of the first month (Leviticus 23:5). The Hebrew day extends from sunset to sunset. Passover Sabbath (the first high day feast of the days of unleavened bread) always occurs with a full moon rising in the east, the 15th day after the new moon. It could not occur before the vernal equinox. By Rabbinical rules Passover can never occur on a Monday, Wednesday, or Friday. The day starting at the previous sunset. Preventing Passover Sabbath from falling on Monday, Wednesday, or Friday eliminates the possibility that Tishri 1 would occur on a Friday, Sunday, or Wednesday. This is because Tishri 1 is always 163 days after Nisan 15. Succoth, the Feast of Tabernacles, was also set to begin on a full moon, the fifteenth day of the first month, Tishri (Leviticus 23:34). Succoth must also occur in the fall, after the gathering of crops (Deuteronomy 16:16).

Disclosure of the Calendar Rules

Unfortunately, only since the 4th century CE has this method, with all of its intricacies, uncontroverted been in use. Until the forth century the rules governing the Hebrew calendar were secret, known, and presumably used, only by a select number of the Sanhedrin. The persecution of Roman emperor Constantius (337�361) threatened the very existence of the Sanhedrin, the body responsible for officially proclaiming the molad. Under these trying circumstances, the Patriarch Hillel II took an extraordinary step to preserve the unity of Israel.

In order to prevent the Jews scattered all over the earth from celebrating their own new moons, festivals and holidays at their own chosen times, he made public the system of calendar calculation which up to then had been a closely guarded secret. Allegedly, the calculated calendar had been used prior to that time only to check the observations and testimonies of witnesses, and to determine the beginning of the spring season.

The method for determining the moladoth and intercalation of leap months throughout the second temple period (BCE 516 �CE 70) and up until the time of Hillel II, as long as there was an independent Sanhedrin, presumably was much more empirical than the methods used today. The priests kept the rules and set the calendar. The Talmudic writings have intercalations being done by some calculation and some observance in the second and third centuries. 

The beginning of the months were determined by direct observation of the new moon, or molad, in Jerusalem. What was observed would have been the first crescent of a young moon since the new moon, i.e., the conjunction, by definition is invisible. The appearance of the young moon would be reported by witnesses to the Sanhedrin. Then these beginnings of each month (rosh hodesh) were sanctified and announced by the Sanhedrin, the Supreme Court in Jerusalem, after witnesses had testified that they had seen the new crescent and after their testimony had been thoroughly examined, confirmed by calculation and duly accepted.

The new moon was set aside as a holiday by the Sanhedrin. The witnesses had to be heard before the afternoon sacrifices or the following day would be declared to be the start of the new month. The obvious problem faced by depending on direct observation of the moon to declare new months is visibility. If the skies were overcast and stormy for a few days at the time of the new moon, a new month could not be declared by direct observation. Hence, the Sanhedrin ruled that months were to be limited to 29 or 30 days, with no fewer than 4 months in a year having either one or the other of these two lengths. Hence, during the Second Temple period the year may have contained as little as 352 to as many as 356 days.

The Calendar Council (Sod Haibbur) of the Sanhedrin regulated the Hebrew calendar by reconciling the calculated solar year and the observed lunar month. Whenever, after two or three years, the annual excess of 11 days had accumulated to approximately 30 days, a thirteenth month, Adar II, was inserted before Nisan in order to assure that Nisan and Passover would occur in the Spring and not retrogress toward winter. But, the remoteness of the spring equinox was only one reason for intercalating a leap month. The other was a late spring. Spring was considered late if crops were unripened or new-born animals were too young. The reformed Jewish calendar eliminated such factors as the calculated calendar fixed the calendar for the foreseeable future (until an new Sanhedrin could be formed).

A year may be embolismic on three grounds-on account of the (state of the green ears of) corn or (that of) fruit (growing on the) trees or the lateness of the tquphah [equinox]. Any two of these reasons may justify an embolismic year, but one of them (alone) does not justify an embolismic year. Since there is some controversy over exactly how and why the Sanhedrin intercalated leap months, we can not know with great certainty when a year was common and when it was embolistic.

It is also possible that months were intercalated by the Sanhedrin to maintain their power. The rules for intercalation were a closely guarded secret. The Sanhedrin had to sanction each new moon and each new year. Because days and months could be added, the Jews in Jerusalem had to send messengers to the Diaspora to tell them the right day to keep the Feast of Passover. This allowed the Sanhedrin some control over the dispersed Jews. It is even possible that one of the rationales used by the pre-Essene movement for splitting from main-stream Judaism in the second century BCE was manipulation of the calendar by the so-called Sons of Zodak, the ruling Hasmonean dynasty.

Just as there were reasons for intercalating a month, there were restrictions on how this could be done. Two leap years were allowed to come in a row, but not three. Adar II, the leap month, also could not be added in a sabbatical year. During a sabbatical year the ground had to lay fallow for the entire year. Requiring the land to be fallow for 13 months instead of 12 would have caused undue hardship for a nation surviving on stored food. For the same reason Adar II could not be added during a time of famine.

Signal fires and messengers were used to communicate the correct day to observe the molad, but communications in the first century C.E. were far to slow to allow the Diaspora to know the correct day with certainty. The Jews of the Diaspora celebrated both days upon which the molad could occur, effectively adding a second day to the new moon, the New Year (Trumpets), Booths (Tabernacles), Passover, and Pentecost to ensure that they were observing the correct day. Many Jews of the first century were uncertain when a molad would be officially declared until well after the official declaration.

The Mishnaic rules governing the Hebrew calendar during the Second Temple period casts grave doubts on the possibility of ever being able to determine on exactly what day of the week on the Gregorian calendar any event recorded in Second Temple time occurred unless there is internal evidence pointing to a specific day. The Talmud appears to preserve the older system of observation of the lunar crescent, if the written record may be understood as reflecting actual procedure. It would seem, therefore, that the system of calendation preserved in the 1st or 2nd century rabbinic texts preserved a system which was in use before BCE 481 and continued in use even after a new one was introduced in Babylonia.

The talmudic system could not have been adopted until�at the earliest�CE 359, and possibly as late as the seventh century. There can, and have been, extensive computer studies done to determine when selected moladoth occurred. However, this does not mean that the first of the month, as determined by the Sanhedrin, occurred on a computed molad. It could have been delayed by as much as two days if the previous month had twenty-nine days and visibility was poor for that molad. Even with good visibility, if Adar II had been added to the end of the previous year, 30 days would have been added just before Nisan. This would have shifted the week forward by two days. If a predicted molad occurred on a Tuesday, but Adar II had been unexpectedly inserted the year before, the actual molad would have occurred on a Thursday instead.

Page last updated: 01/11/04 06:10 PM .

 
 

Does the national archive and treasury of the kings of Judah lie hidden deep underground in the ancient City of David?

NEW

The tomb of King David has been lost since the days of Herod the Great. Have archaeologists and historians now isolated its location? New research suggests the tomb, and a national archive and treasury containing unbelievable wealth, lies not far south of the Haram esh-Sharif. You will find the implications astounding.


What was Jerusalem in the days of Herod and Jesus really like?

Tradition places Herod's Temple on the Haram esh-Sharif. Is this really the site of the Temple in Jesus' day? A new carefully detailed compilation and analysis of the historical evidence says -- absolutely not!

View Temple Video


The Old City of Jerusalem

This small sample section of a beautiful map from the Survey of Israel, suitable for framing, is a must for serious students of the Bible. The map sets forth the topography of the city and provides labels for all major landmarks.

 

Thank you for visiting BIBARCH
Please Visit Our Site Often

rsaclabel.gif (1938 bytes)

Rated in the
Top 10% of Websites
by WebsMostLinked

Rated Outstanding andbest starting web/internet resource by the

sw_award.gif (5126 bytes)

Chosen by librarians at O'Keefe Library, St. Ambrose University, for inclusion in The Best Information on the Net.