Postmodern

Living University

Bookstore

Search Site
Overview
Concepts & Theory
Academics
The Levant
Travel & Touring
Levantine Fieldwork
Marking Time
Biblical Chronology
Music and The Bible
Helps & Aids
Photo Gallery
Who We Are
Our History & Purpose
Useful Links
Article Submissions
Glossary
Works Cited

Copyright � 1997-2007
High Top Media

All Rights Reserved.

Legal Notices

Official PayPal Seal

 

[BibArch Home] [Up] [Hermeneutics] [Contextual]

The postprocessual approach in archaeology, essentially an inductive research methodology, includes a general rejection of the scientific method. Postprocessualists, as postmodernist thinkers, assume there is no such thing as objective reality and embrace hermeneutic and critical theory ideas. The latter refers to approaches based upon the writings of Karl Marx.

The focus of the postprocessual approach is upon interpretation not scientific explanation. Some archaeologists carelessly use the terms explanation and interpretation interchangeably as if they existed as one and the same. In a technical sense, explanation, not interpretation, serves as a part of the scientific method. Interpretation, not explanation, serves as a goal of hermeneutics and Marxist theory.

The debate concerning the applicability of scientific theory and hermeneutic theory to the human sciences continues. In archaeology, as in the other social sciences, the conflict between facts and values, how and why, mechanism and meaning, material culture and non-material culture, and explanation and interpretation, continues to obscure and to obfuscate the common principles that unite the methodologies. Is the use of hermeneutic theory at the expense of scientific explanation? Is the utilization of the scientific method at the expense of meaning? Are interpretation and explanation that far apart?

A philosophical hermeneutic interpretation does not necessarily exclude that goal. When reflecting on philosophical hermeneutic theory, recognizing the many approaches to knowledge acquisition it accommodates within its rules and methods, it is not exactly a quantum leap to see the scientific method as a subset of hermeneutics. That is, there may well be a hermeneutics of science. This for the time being belongs to the philosophers, and their debate into these issues continues. The argument simply may be about whose hermeneutics will produce, as a way of knowing, the most pragmatic results.


Page last updated: 02/15/09 12:41 PM.



Thank you for visiting BIBARCH
Please Visit Our Site Often


rsaclabel.gif (1938 bytes)

sw_award.gif (5126 bytes)

Rated in the
Top 10% of Websites
by WebsMostLinked

 

Chosen by librarians at O'Keefe Library, St. Ambrose University, for inclusion in
The Best Information on the Net.

 

Rated Outstanding and starting web/internet resource by the