|
Up Search Site Contents Books'n Mor Overview Concepts & Theory Levantine Fieldwork The First Christians Perspectives Critical Perspectives Feature Articles Biblical Chronology The Levant Music &The Bible Helps & Aids Travel & Touring Words & Phrases Photo Gallery Useful Links Who We Are Our History & Purpose Works Cited What We Believe Article Submissions How to Cite BibArch How to Contact Us
Click here to send us Questions or Comments



Copyright �
1997-2004
High Top Media
All Rights Reserved.
Legal Notices
| |
For October-December 2003
Volume 6 Number 4 (continued)
[BibArch Home] [Up]
Locating the
Fountain
Gate
In this fourth
and final installment Bill Lavers concludes his Locating Jerusalem's Fountain Gate series.
by Bill
Lavers
[
Part I The Secret Visit
] [
See Part II The Inspection
]
[
PART III The Steps to the
Gihon ]
PART IV The Angle
Returning
to the repair and rebuilding of the wall, we come to the section that
extended from �the stairs that go down from the city of David� which
marked the limit of Shallun�s responsibility, to a point opposite the ascent to
the armoury at the angle, or turning of the wall. This particular section of
the wall occupied the attention of the next four working parties, each of which
is respectively described in the next four verses of Nehemiah 3, from verse 16
to verse 19.
The
important thing to observe here is that there is no change mentioned in the
level of that eastern wall. It appears to have continued along on the same
northerly course and at the same general height above the Kidron Valley. Only
at the end of verse 19 do we find it turning and beginning to ascend. When we
consider this in relation to what we are told in
Nehemiah 12:37, then the length
of wall we are concerned with here must have been relatively short, a fact which
would also lead us to infer that it could well have suffered an exceptional
amount of damage.
Here is
what verse 37 tells us: �At the Fountain gate and straight before them, they
went up by the stairs of the city of David, at the going up of the wall above
the house of David, even as far as the Water Gate eastward.� Were it not
for those four verses in
Nehemiah 3, we would naturally be led to believe that
the ascent of the stairs referred to in
Nehemiah 12:37 was simply an upward
continuation of those which are said in
Nehemiah 3:15 to have gone down from the
city of David. Yet Ezra�s party went straight before them from the Fountain
Gate, and then went up the stairs. The section of wall described in
verses 16
to19 must therefore have lain between the Fountain Gate and the ascent of the
stairs.
Before we
spend time taking a detailed look at what those four verses are telling us, we
need to consider what Nehemiah meant in
12:37 when he spoke of �the going up
of the wall above the house of David.� That simple statement has led to a
great deal of controversy among biblical scholars because they are not inclined
to accept what the words are telling them � that David could well have had a
house on the terrace, at the northern end of which both the wall and the steps
began to ascend. They rose to such a height that they would have overlooked not
only David�s house, but his garden � the King�s Garden that we have already
discussed�as well as the Tabernacle, the Pool of Siloah, and the Fountain
Gate.
There are
two definite indications given in the scriptural record showing that David had a
house on that particular terrace. Both are found in II Samuel, the first in
chapter 6 and the second in
chapter 7. In chapter 6, beginning with
verse 12,
we have the account of how David brought the ark of God into the city of David
from the house of Obed-edom at Gibeah. It is said that David, girded with a
linen ephod, danced before the Lord as he led those who bore the ark and the
joyous procession of the people who accompanied them. When they finally reached
the terrace above the Gihon, however, we are told that: �Michal, Saul�s
daughter (who was David�s wife) looked through a window, and saw king
David leaping and dancing before the Lord: and she despised him in her heart.�
Michal, watching the events from the window of David�s house, clearly saw
everything that took place. That means David�s house had to have been
reasonably close by.
In the
following chapter, we find the king sitting in his house on some later occasion
speaking with the prophet Nathan and saying to him: �See now, I dwell in an
house of cedar, but the ark of God dwells within curtains.� Look, David was
saying to Nathan, from the comfort of his own home, there is the Tabernacle, and
within its curtains dwells the ark of the Covenant; yet here am I dwelling in a
house of cedar. Nathan, knowing what was in David�s heart, but at the same
time, seemingly acting on his own initiative, said to the king, �Go, do all
that is in thine heart; for the Lord is with thee.�
These two
sections of scripture alone illustrate the obvious proximity of David�s house to
the Tabernacle. Although it was built some little time before the Ark was
brought into the city, David would no doubt have prepared the site for the
Tabernacle and that for his own house at the same time, carefully selecting the
site where each was to be raised up. Prior to that, in fact from the time he
had first won control of the Jebusite citadel and had successfully ousted the
Jebusites from their almost impregnable position on that south-east ridge, David
had dwelt in that strong commanding fortress, making it his official palace. It
henceforth became his seat of government and regency over the twelve tribes of
Israel.
For the
first seven and one half years following his anointing as king, David had
reigned at Hebron, but only over the tribe of Judah. Not until the end of that
period did the elders of Israel submit themselves to his authority and anoint
him king over the twelve tribes. Together they then took Jerusalem, and David
reigned there over the whole of Israel for the next thirty three years. He was
thirty-seven years of age when he began to reign in Jerusalem, but it was to be
a further six years before he brought up the Ark from Gibeah.
From the
time he took the Jebusite city and established it as the capital of the nation
of Israel,
II Samuel 5:10 says that David�s affairs prospered: he �went on and
grew great, and the Lord God of hosts was with him.� Or, as Josephus
expressed it: his affairs did more and more prosper by the providence of God,
who took care that they should improve and be augmented (Ant.7.3.2).
David�s
rapid rise to power quickly attracted the attention of Hiram, king of Tyre, who
sent an embassy to David, probably with the intention of forming an alliance
with this new powerful monarch whose territory now bordered upon his own. That
alliance was to lead not only to the steady growth of trade and commerce between
the two nations, but to the establishment of a strong bond of friendship between
the two rulers themselves, which was to last throughout the remainder of David�s
reign and on into that of his son Solomon.
David
availed himself of their alliance to ask Hiram for both wood and artisans to
construct a palatial residence, with the result that Hiram sent numerous cedars
together with carpenters and stonemasons, �and they built him a house�
(verse 11). The fact that the scriptures speak primarily of this particular
house, does not mean of course that David did not construct others. I
Chronicles 15:1 clearly shows that he built a number of residences in the city
of David.
II Samuel
5:13-16 tells us that David took more concubines and wives from Jerusalem after
he came from Hebron, and that more sons and daughters were born to him. So
large a family obviously necessitated far more than just this one house. God�s
primary concern, however is in relating the principal facts that he wants us to
understand and give our attention to. Other factors, although important to Him
in His overall relationship with David, He naturally sets aside as having no
bearing on the issues that need to concern us.
The
terrace, then, to which our attention is primarily drawn, would have been
prepared well in advance as the site for both David�s house and the Tabernacle,
although some time could have elapsed between the construction of David�s house
and the bringing up of the Ark, depending on how soon after the beginning of
David�s reign the house was built. As I said just a little earlier, it was six
years after David began to reign that he brought up the Ark from Gibeah. Within
that space of time, and perhaps even while his house was under construction,
David could have had his King�s Garden created there, not only for his own
delight, but to provide a fitting aesthetic setting for the Tabernacle.
That
terrace must have been beautiful in the extreme. It was the place where God had
chosen to dwell in the midst of His People; where they could come and worship
before Him and bring not only their material offerings, but their dedicated
hearts and contrite spirits in which He took particular delight. From the
beginning, God�s pleasure had always been in a simple tabernacle, a fact that He
made explicitly clear to David when His servant began considering the inadequacy
of a mere tent for the Ark of God as he sat looking upon the Tabernacle from the
comfort and comparative luxury of his own sumptuous house of cedar (II Samuel 7:2). Notice how God made His feelings known on this matter through the prophet
Nathan.
And it came to pass that night, that the word of the Lord
came unto Nathan, saying, Go and tell My servant David, Thus saith the Lord,
Shalt thou build Me an house for Me to dwell in? Whereas I have not dwelt in
any house since the time that I brought up the children of Israel out of Egypt,
even to this day, but have walked in a tent and in a tabernacle. In all the
places wherein I have walked with all the children of Israel, spake I a word
with any of the tribes of Israel, whom I commanded to feed My People Israel,
saying Why build ye not Me an house of cedar.
(II
Samuel
7:4-7.)
We seem to
give little, if any attention to the feelings that God expressed in those few
brief verses above concerning the long period of time He had dwelt among His
People within the fabric of a Tabernacle. Never, throughout the whole of that
time, did He question why a more durable
type of habitation was not considered for Him. Yet now, because David could not
comfortably countenance such a disparity between the physical luxuries of his
own regal abode and the Bedouin-like habitation of his God, the seeds were sown
for a more stately and permanent edifice to take its place.
I have
often wondered whether God agreed to a Temple on the same basis that He agreed
to give His People a king: that it was in their hearts to follow after the
example of the Gentile powers around them. Even though David himself was a man
after God�s own heart, God well knew that the people looked more to the outward
show of strength, power, and majestic splendour than to the inner, unseen
workings of divinity.
Against the Sepulchers of David
Returning
now, once again, to the account we are following in Nehemiah 3, we pick up the
story in
verse 16, to which I have already alluded but not yet quoted:
�After him repaired Nehemiah the son of Azbuk, the ruler of
the half part of Beth-zur, unto the place over against the sepulchres of David,
and to the pool that was made, and unto the house of the Themighty.� The sepulchres of David are the sepulchres of the house of David. They were
situated outside of the southern wall of the Temple.
Now
Nehemiah is saying that those sepulchres were over against, or opposite, that
part of the wall to which reference is here being made. Since the wall was
still running along an approximate north-south axis at this point, as far as we
are given to understand, then any point opposite to it must mean somewhere
upslope in a westerly direction. That being the case, we must place the
southern wall of the Temple just a little further to the north, again showing
that the Temple would in no way have disturbed or encroached upon that important
terrace region above the Gihon.
I have
already referred to the pool that was made
as very probably being the same artificial body of water that
Isaiah 22:11 says
was made between the two walls for the water of the old pool, and which could
well have been the King�s Pool to which Nehemiah made his way on his secret
midnight ride. Whatever this pool was, why it was made, and why Nehemiah was
particularly commissioned to go there, must remain enshrouded in mystery for the
present. Its obvious importance, however, is clear from what little we are told
of it, so it needs to be kept well in mind.
The house of the mighty,
or of the heroes,
as it is otherwise translated, is likewise unknown. It could have been a small
building constructed close by David�s house and dedicated as a type of memorial
to those valiant fighting men of David�s small army who faithfully stood by him
and fearlessly fought for him against greatly superior odds during the
establishment of his kingdom. A register of those mighty warriors is given in I
Chronicles 11, beginning with
verse 10 which describes them as
�. . . the mighty men whom David had, who strengthened
themselves with him in his kingdom, and with all Israel, to make him king,
according to the word of the Lord concerning Israel.�
The next two verses of Nehemiah 3 are particularly interesting in that the
following two working parties therein referred to are made up of Levites. Each group was led
by the ruler of the half part of Keilah, a town in the hill country of Hebron. The sections of wall they were responsible for repairing were in the very area
that Nehemiah investigated
when he first
reached Jerusalem. As we have already seen, Nehemiah was committed to reaching
only one site on his midnight ride, and that was where both the Fountain Gate
and the King�s Garden were located. It was something within that immediate area
that Nehemiah closely examined,
although we are not told what it was.
That means
God would expect us to carefully consider whatever further evidence was given in
the account which would enable us to arrive at a reasonably logical conclusion,
and follow that conclusion through. What we are told in
Nehemiah 3:17-18 could
well be at least part of the evidence we need. That length of wall assigned to
those two parties of Levites could have been the section that Nehemiah is said
to have viewed in
verse 15 of chapter 2. Like any good detective, we cannot
afford to overlook any clue that could possibly shed light on what we are
seeking to find. Christ himself said that if there was anything we particularly
wanted, we should diligently search for it, and that our search would ultimately
be rewarded (Matthew
7:8).
If, as I speculated earlier, some point of access to
the Davidic
tomb complex had been disturbed and a secret means of entry had somehow been
violated, who but the Levites had better
authority to enter and investigate it. Since the sepulchres of David were said
in
verse 16 to be somewhere opposite, or over against this section of wall, then
it is quite possible that such a point of entry could well have been located in
this area.
One
further point that should be taken into consideration in this respect is that
five working parties are said to have been engaged on the wall that bordered the
terrace, all the way from the pool of Siloah by the King�s Garden to the point
where the wall turned and began to ascend. That can only mean that a great deal
of repair work must have been necessary. There can be little doubt that the
terrace area retained its importance throughout the whole period of the kings of
Judah. The Fountain Gate was certainly the principal means of access to and
from the city of David, and led down to the important highway that ran through
the Kidron Valley.
Isaiah
showed it to have been a point of mediation both in the days of Ahaz and in
those of his son Hezekiah. It is little wonder, therefore, that it would have
been strongly fortified, and strongly defended too when the Babylonian forces
besieged the city in the days of Zedekiah. And especially would the fighting
have been intense in those last days when Zedekiah and his men finally made
their escape, and were pursued through the tunnel when the Babylonians
eventually broke through. The stairs, somewhere between the two walls, that
must have led down to the tunnel, may also have been a means of access to some
secret entrance to David�s sepulchre, with the result that damage to it could
have resulted from the fighting. This is nothing but speculation, I know, but
it is something that needs to be considered, especially when we have the
opportunity later to search that particular area for whatever subterranean
passages may exist there.

Page last updated:
11/28/04 08:43 AM.

| |
|

Does the national archive and treasury of the kings of Judah lie
hidden deep underground in the ancient City of David? |
The tomb of King David has
been lost since the days of Herod the Great. Have archaeologists
and historians now isolated its location? New research suggests
the tomb, and a national archive and treasury containing
unbelievable wealth, lies not far south of the Haram esh-Sharif.
You will find the implications astounding. |
|
|

What was Jerusalem in the days of Herod and
Jesus really like? |
Tradition places
Herod's Temple on the Haram esh-Sharif. Is this really the site of
the Temple in Jesus' day? A new carefully detailed compilation and
analysis of the historical evidence says -- absolutely
not!
View Temple
Video |
|
|
The Old City of Jerusalem |
This
small sample section of a beautiful map from the Survey of Israel,
suitable for framing, is a must for serious students of the Bible.
The map sets forth the topography of the city and provides labels
for all major landmarks. |
|
|
|