Hadrian's Grand Progress

Up
Search Site
Contents
Books'n Mor
Overview
Concepts & Theory
Levantine Fieldwork
The First Christians
Perspectives
Critical Perspectives
Feature Articles
Biblical Chronology
The Levant
Music &The Bible
Helps & Aids
Travel & Touring
Words & Phrases
Photo Gallery
Useful Links
Who We Are
Our History & Purpose
Works Cited
What We Believe
Article Submissions
How to Cite BibArch
How to Contact Us

Click here to send us Questions or Comments

Copyright � 1997-2004
High Top Media

All Rights Reserved.

Legal Notices

 

BibArch Home ] Up ]

Hadrian's grand progress through Syria, Palestine, and Egypt, according to Peters, occurred in CE 129�130, when several cities were rebuilt at the imperial command and expense (Peters 1985:126). Relative to the interwar period condition of Jerusalem he offered the following:

Jerusalem was undoubtedly a ruined city after A.D. 70, but it was not an abandoned one. The Tenth Legion put there by Titus still had its station there where Herod once had his palace along the western city wall, and at least some of the Christians returned from their self-imposed exile to Pella. The Jewish evidence is far less direct, but since there was as yet no ban on their living in Jerusalem, there is not reason to think that some Jews did not choose to do so. There was certainly Jewish pilgrims to the city, and it has been argued that that fact, when added to the evidence for reburial, makes plausible some kind of Jewish settlement in Jerusalem after A.D. 70. (Peters 1985:125.)

McRay, acknowledging Jack Finegan�s suggestion that the Tomb of David/Cenacle might have been a Judeo-Christian place of assembly, pointed out that:

Bargil Pixner has expanded on Finegan�s idea, demonstrating that the remains are from a Roman-period Judeo-Christian synagogue known as the Church of the Apostles. The synagogue, he argues, was built in the decade after 73 when Jewish Christians returned from Pella. They are believed to have reused Herodian stone from the Temple Mount for the structure, orienting the niche toward the Church of the Holy Sepulcher rather than toward the site of the temple, as was the practice for Jewish synagogues built before 70. Some of the Herodian stones have been found in the portion of the first-century wall that still stands. (McRay 1991:203.see also Pixner 1990.)

According to Dio Cassius (ca. 150-235) when Roman emperor Hadrian made a grand progress through Syria, Palestine, and Egypt in CE 129�130 a number of cities were rebuilt at imperial command and expense. Hadrian thoroughly inspected all Roman garrisons and forts eliminating some, relocating others, and establishing new ones (Dio Cassius Roman History 69.9.1; Cary 1969:441). Dio stated that the Emperor, consistent with this grand progress, visited Jerusalem, ca. CE 130, contemplated certain building programs in the city, renamed it Aelia Capitolina, and raised a new temple to Jupiter (Dio Cassius Roman History 69.12.1-2; Cary 1969:447). Concerning that imperial visit, Epiphanius said that Hadrian saw a small Church of God (Epiphanius De Mensuris 14; Koester 1989:93).

This information, from all three writers, is hearsay with Dio closest to actual events. Both Eusebius and Epiphanius were prolific writers deeply committed to orthodoxy. Both men were well-versed, knowledgeable historians and scholars who demonstrated in their writings their use of the records and original sources extant in their day. While their orthodox paradigm appears throughout their writings there is little, if any, reason to doubt the veracity of their statements as used above. In these instances their statements were incidental and peripheral to Greco-Roman orthodoxy. Particularly in regard to the statement from Epiphanius about Hadrian and the small Church of God on Mt. Sion the report was such a peripheral piece of information that it served no known orthodox purpose to contrive it. Apparently he simply passed on information he understood from his own study to be fact as he recounted historical events.

Page last updated: 12/13/04 07:22 PM.

Does the national archive and treasury of the kings of Judah lie hidden deep underground in the ancient City of David?

NEW

The tomb of King David has been lost since the days of Herod the Great. Have archaeologists and historians now isolated its location? New research suggests the tomb, and a national archive and treasury containing unbelievable wealth, lies not far south of the Haram esh-Sharif. You will find the implications astounding.


What was Jerusalem in the days of Herod and Jesus really like?

Tradition places Herod's Temple on the Haram esh-Sharif. Is this really the site of the Temple in Jesus' day? A new carefully detailed compilation and analysis of the historical evidence says -- absolutely not!

View Temple Video


The Old City of Jerusalem

This small sample section of a beautiful map from the Survey of Israel, suitable for framing, is a must for serious students of the Bible. The map sets forth the topography of the city and provides labels for all major landmarks.

 

 

Thank you for visiting BIBARCH
Please Visit Our Site Often

rsaclabel.gif (1938 bytes)

Rated in the
Top 10% of Websites
by WebsMostLinked

Rated Outstanding andbest starting web/internet resource by the

sw_award.gif (5126 bytes)

Chosen by librarians at O'Keefe Library, St. Ambrose University, for inclusion in The Best Information on the Net.