|
Up Search Site Contents Books'n Mor Overview Concepts & Theory Levantine Fieldwork The First Christians Perspectives Critical Perspectives Feature Articles Biblical Chronology The Levant Music &The Bible Helps & Aids Travel & Touring Words & Phrases Photo Gallery Useful Links Who We Are Our History & Purpose Works Cited What We Believe Article Submissions How to Cite BibArch How to Contact Us
Click here to send us Questions or Comments



Copyright �
1997-2004
High Top Media
All Rights Reserved.
Legal Notices
| |
[ BibArch Home ] [ Up ]
Orthodox Christianity, as it sought to become the exclusive religion,
distanced itself from Judeo-Christian Churches of God and all Jewish Christian
sects. At first the orthodox rated the latter as the old way, later a
detrimental way, and finally a heretical one.
Early in the second century some Christian Gentiles aspired to not only
distance themselves from Judeo-Christians but began to consider
Judeo-Christianity as heterodoxy and their Greco-Roman Christianity as
orthodoxy. To further separate themselves from other professing Christian
groups, and from what they perceived as Jewish Christian sects, Greco-Roman
Christians began calling themselves "catholic" meaning universal. By
CE 200, according to Elaine Pagels, Greco-Roman Christianity.
...had become an institution headed by a three-rank hierarchy of bishops,
priests, and deacons, who understood themselves to be the guardians of the
only "true faith." The majority of churches, among which the church
of Rome took a leading role, rejected all other viewpoints as heresy.
Deploring the diversity of the earlier movement, Bishop Irenaeus and his
followers insisted that there could be only one church, and outside of that
church, he declared, "there is no salvation." Members of this church
alone are orthodox (literally, "straight thinking") Christians. And,
he claimed, this church must be catholic�that is, universal. Whoever
challenged that consensus, arguing instead for other forms of Christian
teaching, was declared to be a heretic, and expelled. When the orthodox gained
military support, sometime after the Emperor Constantine became Christian in
the fourth century, the penalty for heresy escalated. (Pagels
1979:xxiii.)
While the general sense of the word catholic is "universal" it also
can mean "according to the whole". In the latter sense Greco-Roman
assemblies began to refer to themselves as catholic, that is, according to the
whole, and to abandon the phrase Church of God. Justo Gonz�lez provided the
logic underlying this change: "To separate itself from the various
heretical groups and sects, the ancient church began calling itself
"catholic." This title underscored both its universality and the
inclusiveness of the witness on which it stood. It was the church
"according to the whole," that is, according to the total witness of
all the apostles.... Only the church "catholic," the church
"according to the whole,: could lay claim to the entire apostolic
witness" (Gonz�lez
1984:66).
The
Old Roman Creed
I believe in God almighty;
And in Jesus Christ His only Son our Lord,
Who was born from the Holy Spirit and the Virgin Mary,
Who
under Pontius Pilate was crucified and buried, and the third day rose
again from the dead,
Who ascended into heaven and sits at the right hand of the father, whence He will come to judge the living and the dead; and in the Holy Spirit, the holy Church, the remission of sins, the resurrection of the flesh, the life everlasting. |
Greco-Roman Christianity devised a means for its people to identify each
other and to distinguish between Christians who were orthodox from those who
were heterodox in the form of the so-called Apostles Creed. The direct
predecessor of the Apostles� Creed was the Old Roman Creed or the Ancient
Roman Symbol also known as the "symbol of the
faith" (Wood
1979:808). Justo Gonz�lez explains:
Another element in the church�s response to heresies was what we now call
the "Apostles� Creed.".... [I]ts basic text was put together,
probably in Rome, around the year 150. It was then called "symbol of the
faith." The word "symbol" in this context did not have the
meaning that it has for us today; rather, it meant a means of recognition,
such as a token that a general gave to a messenger, so that the recipient
could recognize a true messenger. Likewise, the "symbol" put
together in Rome was a means whereby Christians could distinguish true
believers from those who followed the various heresies circulating at the
time, particularly gnosticism and Marcionism. Any who could affirm this creed
were neither Gnostics nor Marcionites. (Gonz�lez 1984:
63.)
The Old Roman Creed appears consistent with the main currents of
Judeo-Christianity and Judeo-Christianity seems orthodox in these matters of
faith. It is quite doubtful that Judeo-Christians would affirm the later
Apostles� Creed with its Nicene overtones. The idea of Jesus
descending into Hades while dead is a Greek dualistic concept. His rising on the
third day appears at first to be biblical but the thrust of the statement
involves the Lord�s-day teaching of the orthodox. That is, the concept is a
derivative of an orthodox hermeneutic wherein every Sunday is the day of
Resurrection and the heart of all worship. Judeo-Christians celebrated the
weekly Sabbath not the Lord�s-day nor did they subscribe to Greek dualism and
immortal soul mythology. This, of course, alienated the Judeo-Christians from
the orthodox and made them heterodox in Greco-Roman Christian eyes.

Page last updated:
12/13/04 07:22 PM.

| |
|

Does the national archive and treasury of the kings of Judah lie
hidden deep underground in the ancient City of David? |
The tomb of King David has
been lost since the days of Herod the Great. Have archaeologists
and historians now isolated its location? New research suggests
the tomb, and a national archive and treasury containing
unbelievable wealth, lies not far south of the Haram esh-Sharif.
You will find the implications astounding. |
|
|

What was Jerusalem in the days of Herod and
Jesus really like? |
Tradition places
Herod's Temple on the Haram esh-Sharif. Is this really the site of
the Temple in Jesus' day? A new carefully detailed compilation and
analysis of the historical evidence says -- absolutely
not!
View Temple
Video |
|
|
The Old City of Jerusalem |
This
small sample section of a beautiful map from the Survey of Israel,
suitable for framing, is a must for serious students of the Bible.
The map sets forth the topography of the city and provides labels
for all major landmarks. |
|
|
|