Up
Search Site
Contents
Books'n Mor
Overview
Concepts & Theory
Levantine Fieldwork
The First Christians
Perspectives
Critical Perspectives
Feature Articles
The Levant
Music &The Bible
Helps & Aids
Travel & Touring
Words & Phrases
Photo Gallery
Useful Links
Who We Are
Our History & Purpose
Works Cited
What We Believe
Article Submissions
How to Cite BibArch
How to Contact Us

Click here to send us Questions or Comments

[ BibArch Home ] [ Up ] [ The Conversion Visit ] [ The Famine Visit ] [ The Jerusalem Conference ] [ The Hearing Before James ] [ The Hasty Visit ] [ The Collection Visit ]

At Galatians 1:15-2:10 (NIV) Paul provided detailed chronological information regarding his life. He wrote:

1:15But when God, who set me apart from birth and called me by his grace, was pleased ¹⁶to reveal his Son in me so that I might preach him among the Gentiles, I did not consult any man, ¹⁷nor did I go up to Jerusalem to see those who were apostles before I was, but I went immediately into Arabia and later returned to Damascus.

18Then after three years, I went up to Jerusalem to get acquainted with Peter and stayed with him fifteen days. ¹⁹I saw none of the other apostles-only James, the Lord�s brother. ²⁰I assure you before God that what I am writing you is no lie.

21Later I went to Syria and Cilicia. ²²I was personally unknown to the churches of Judea that are in Christ. ²³They only heard the report: "The man who formerly persecuted us is now preaching the faith he once tried to destroy." ²⁴And they praised God because of me.

2:1Fourteen years later I went up again to Jerusalem, this time with Barnabas. I took Titus along also. ²I went in response to a revelation and set before them the gospel that I preach among the Gentiles. But I did this privately to those who seemed to be leaders, for fear that I was running or had run my race in vain. ³Yet not even Titus, who was with me, was compelled to be circumcised, even though he was a Greek. ⁴This matter arose because some false brothers had infiltrated our ranks to spy on the freedom we have in Christ Jesus and to make us slaves. ⁵We did not give in to them for a moment, so that the truth of the gospel might remain with you. ⁶As for those who seemed to be important-whatever they were makes no difference to me; God does not judge by external appearance-those men added nothing to my message. ⁷On the contrary, they saw that I had been entrusted with the task of preaching the gospel to the Gentiles, just as Peter had been to the Jews. ⁸For God, who was at work in the ministry of Peter as an apostle to the Jews, was also at work in my ministry as an apostle to the Gentiles. ⁹James, Peter and John, those reputed to be pillars, gave me and Barnabas the right hand of fellowship when they recognized the grace given to me. They agreed that we should go to the Gentiles, and they to the Jews. ¹⁰All they asked was that we should continue to remember the poor, the very thing I was eager to do.

This material raises three questions.

1. Does Paul begin counting the three years and the fourteen years from the date of his conversion or from his first visit to Jerusalem following his conversion?

2. Does Paul use some kind of unique "Jewish inclusive reckoning" in referring to the three years and the fourteen years thereby shortening them (wherein parts of years are reckoned as full years)?

3. Does Paul consider the three years and the fourteen years as successive or concurrent periods?

These matters were in part addressed by Paul J. Achtemeier in his analysis of early Pauline chronological problems. Achtemeier holds that the epistle to the Galatians followed the events of Acts 15 and was a result of it. Nevertheless as to the three-year (Galatians 1:18) and the fourteen-year (Galatians 2:1) periods he wrote:

It is not clear whether the point of origin for the fourteen years was the conversion of the first visit to Jerusalem. Taking into account the inclusive reckoning current in Paul�s time, the visit was thirteen years after either his conversion or his earlier visit to Jerusalem. The three years and fourteen years are to be reckoned as coinciding, not successive-as both commence at Paul�s conversion rather than the fourteen years of Galatians 2:1 being calculated from Paul�s first visit. (Achtemeier 1987:22.)

Arguing that the two periods each began at Paul�s conversion, while plausible, is not a point generally contended by scholars. Most follow the rationale of linking the two periods as successive, so that the full period is understood as three plus fourteen for a total of seventeen years, less two years based upon so-called "Jewish inclusive reckoning" for a revised total of fifteen years. As to this traditional understanding John A. T. Robinson wrote:

No one, I believe, would begin by supposing otherwise, though once the other way of taking it is suggested there is no way of disproving it. (Robinson 1976:37.)

The other way to which Robinson referred makes these two periods coincide for the first three years and not run successively. By assigning an early date for the Acts 15 proceeding, CE 48, and subtracting the traditional fifteen years the date of Paul�s conversion yields CE 33 or three years after a CE 30 crucifixion.

In the alternative, assigning a late 49 or early 50 date, perhaps in December or January, for the Acts 15 proceeding and subtracting fourteen years yields a plausible conversion date for Paul in CE 35 which would allow a CE 30 date for the crucifixion. While it appears to allow time for a CE 33 alternative date for the crucifixion the events between the crucifixion and Paul�s conversion would have to be artificially manipulated and compressed and in any case Nisan 14 was on Friday not Wednesday of that year.

Robinson�s opinion was that:

Though we cannot be absolutely certain, it looks as if the most likely date for the crucifixion is 30-the only serious alternative astronomically and calendrically being 33. (Robinson 1976:37.)

Why? Robinson�s paradigm requires a Friday crucifixion and a Sunday morning resurrection. The Passover, Nisan 14, was on a Friday in CE 33 but interestingly enough in both 30 and 31 it was on a Wednesday. An apparent misunderstanding of the rules pertaining to the intercalary years resulting from the utilization of the Babylonian calendar by many scholars has led to the erroneous date of the Passover to be reckoned as Friday, April 7, 30 when Nisan 14, according to the Hebrew calculated calendar, was Wednesday, April 5.

In any event, while Robinson believed no one would seriously argue the coinciding of the two periods in the Galatians volume in the Word Biblical Commentary Longenecker did just that. In establishing his argument he stated:

In order to accommodate the three-year and fourteen year time spans of Gal 1:18 and 2:1 within the limits imposed for Jesus� crucifixion and Paul�s initial Corinthian ministry, and still hold to the identification of Gal 2:1-10 with Acts 11:27-30, at least two of the following three assumptions must be made:

1. That the three years and fourteen years are concurrent, not consecutive-that is, that both are to be measured from Paul�s conversion, and not that the four teen years of Galatians 2:1 are to be counted from Paul�s first visit;

2. That Paul in Galatians 1:18 and in 2:1 is using a method of computation wherein parts of years are counted as full years; and

3. That Jesus crucifixion took place in A.D. 30, with Paul�s conversion two or three years afterwards. (Longenecker 1990:lxxxiii.)

There were several misplaced suppositions inherent in this material. First, as in Robinson, because of tradition Longenecker presumed that the year of the crucifixion must have Nisan 14 occurring on Friday in order to rationalize a Friday crucifixion and a Sunday morning resurrection. Second, that it is necessary to equate the events of Galatians 2:1-10 with Acts 11:27-30. Third, that the method of calculation in Galatians 1:18 and 2:1 was inclusive reckoning wherein parts of years are counted as full years. Fourth, that the Babylonian calendar is to be preferred over the calculated Hebrew calendar.

The epistle to the Galatians recorded a visit by the apostle Paul to Jerusalem which cannot be conveniently correlated with any of the accounts in Acts of the Apostles. This was the a visit of Paul, Barnabas, and Titus to Jerusalem to confer with the apostles and elders of the mother church. This was the Apostolic Conference occurring a few months prior to the CE 49 hearing before James on the issue of circumcision and the law of Moses (Galatians 2:1-10).

The Acts of the Apostles is secondary for establishing a Pauline chronology. Where ambiguity lies it has to be taken as a principal authority. It provides an account of the remaining five of the six known Jerusalem visits by Paul as a Christian. These may be referred to as the conversion visit (Acts 9:26-30), the famine visit (Acts 11:27-30), the hearing before James at Jerusalem (Acts 15:1-30) the hasty visit (Acts 18:22), and the collection visit (Acts 21:15-18).By placing the events of Galatians 1-2 and Acts 15 into their first-century historical context one may discern their chronological implication. The primary factor in establishing early Pauline chronology is the Procouncilship of Gallio. The events recorded in Acts of the Apostles from the hearing before James to Paul�s appearance before Gallio contain so much detail that the date of the Acts 15 proceeding can be known with specificity.

Taking into account the Jewish character of the early church permits the development of a realistic Pauline chronology, utilizing Galatians and Acts of the Apostles, based upon Judeo-Christian Sabbath observance and festival celebration together with their reliance on first-century Hebrew calendar rules. The result is the harmonization of the events recorded in Galatians and Acts of the Apostles.

Thank you for visiting BIBARCH�
Please Visit Our Site Often