|
|
|
Click here to send us Questions or Comments
Copyright �
1997-2004
|
After his encounter on the road to Damascus Paul entered the city (Acts 9:8, 10-11; 22:11; 26:20) where he remained for a few days (Acts 9:19). Giving preference to the "immediately" of Galatians 1:16 with its sense of "without delay" the details in Acts of the Apostles infer that after but a few days in Damascus Paul withdrew into Arabia. Paul states that after his conversion he "immediately" went into Arabia (Galatians 1:17; see also I Corinthians 15:8). The sense is "without delay" not "at once" or "instantly." This statement infers Paul made no side trip to Jerusalem to confer with the apostles but rather retreated into Arabia without any delay. Three years after his conversion, and the sojourn in Arabia, he again departed Damascus traveling to Jerusalem. At Jerusalem he "stayed with Peter fifteen days" (Galatians 1:18). This is consistent with the practice of the church in keeping the weekly Sabbath. Fifteen days would have permitted Paul to attend the mother "headquarters" Sabbath services on three separate Sabbaths. An arrival before sunset Friday evening would permit his residing with Peter a Sabbath, then a full week including a Sabbath, followed by another full week including a Sabbath. Paul had freedom of movement in Jerusalem and spoke boldly in the name of Jesus of Nazareth. This upset Hellenistic Jews who attempted to kill him. When the church learned of it, presumably just before the third Sabbath, they took him to Caesarea and sent him off to Tarsus (Acts 9:28-29). His hurried departure would have been after sunset Saturday night. The whole period consisted of fifteen days. There is no New Testament evidence of apostolic travel on the Sabbath. Quite the contrary the apostles did not travel on the Sabbath as the Sabbath was the day of worship in the first-century Church of God. While there is no evidence of apostolic travel on the Sabbath this should not be confused with the Jewish halakha concerning a "Sabbath Days journey." Paul�s reference to two Jerusalem visits not only set forth the event of his conversion as the focal point of his dating in these chapters but as shall be established later preceded the Acts 15 Jerusalem Conference as well. Dating both the three years (Galatians 1:18) and the fourteen years (Galatians 2:1) from Paul�s conversion is somewhat novel. Acts 9:19-22 provided the account of what Paul did during those few days (Acts 9:18). The Holy Spirit coupled with Paul�s great rabbinic knowledge of the Hebrew Scriptures permitted him to "proclaim Jesus in the synagogues" to the amazement of everyone (Acts 9:19-21). The details of the visit to Arabia does not occur in Acts of the Apostles. Verse 23, however, picks up with the events following Paul�s return from Arabia. The trip presumably occurred between the events of Verse 22 and Verse 23. Paul then returned to Damascus following his Arabian visit. During that stay he generated sufficient opposition among the local traditional Jews that they attempted to kill him necessitating his escape to Jerusalem. There is no hint in Galatians 1:11-17 that Paul had to escape to go into Arabia. This suggests that there is no linkage between his leaving Damascus to go into Arabia and this escape from Damascus. Nevertheless, this data in Acts of the Apostles harmonizes into the Galatians 1:11-17 description of his leaving for the Arabian desert and then returning "once more" to Damascus. Paul�s later escape from Damascus (Galatians 1:17) occurred during the rule of Nabataean King Aretas (Harithat IV) who died in CE 40 (II Corinthians 11:32-33). Josephus rendered an account providing the details of Aretas� boundary dispute with Herod Antipas. He describes Aretas as the "king of Arabia and Petrea." The Roman emperor Tiberias came in on the side of Herod Antipas and ordered Vitellius, proconsul of Syria, "to make war with Aretas." On the way Vitellius received communications informing him of the death of Tiberius and he recalled his army. Tiberius died March 16, CE 37 and at that time Damascus was under the control of imperial Rome and administered by Vitellius. As King Aretas died in CE 40 Paul�s escape from Damascus would have had to occur between 37 and 40 and accordingly Paul�s conversion between 34 and 37. This is consistent with a CE 35 conversion date for Paul and his escape from Damascus in CE 38 during the Aretas� administration. The question remains open as to when Aretas received Damascus from Caligula in the imperial settlement of the affairs of Syria. The Aretas� administration in Damascus may have begun as early as CE 37 based upon archeological evidence in the form of a single coin. This was the view of Dosker who wrote:
While this coin evidence, for whatever it is worth, infers that Paul�s conversion could have occurred as early as CE 34 it does not lessen the possibility of a CE 35 or later conversion. It merely strengthens the case for the conversion between 34 and 37. The account in Acts of the Apostles continued:
Caesarea Maritima was the port city for the Roman province of Judea. Paul�s being brought there would infer a boat trip rather than preparation for a journey by costal overland route. Traveling from Caesarea, Paul would have booked passage and journeyed by boat to Tarsus in Cilicia.
Page last updated: 02/03/05 05:46 PM.
|
|
Thank you for visiting BIBARCH�
|
starting web/internet resource by the
